Skip to main content

About your Search

20121006
20121014
SHOW
Hannity 10
STATION
LANGUAGE
English 10
Search Results 0 to 9 of about 10 (some duplicates have been removed)
FOX News
Oct 9, 2012 9:00pm PDT
prevent violent crime in the inner cities is to bring opportunity and get people out of poverty in the inner cities and teach good discipline, good character. that is a civil society. that's what charities and civic groups and churches do to help make sure they realize the value in one another. >> you do that by cutting taxes? >> those are your wards, not mine. >> thank you very much, sir. >> that was strange. >> sean: that is some of the distortion that ryan will face off with joe if the-in-his-mouth debate here on the fox newschannel. here with the reaction to the left spin, the co-host of "the five," dana perino and stuart varny, welcome both of you. >> thank you, sean. >> sean: six consecutive days, he has been prepping. the hill reports they are watching videos of ryan's speeches and ryan interviews -- the purpose is what? because they're afraid he will make a mistake? or they are preparing the zingers to attack romney/ryan. >> a couple of things. it seems they are taking this debate a lot more seriously than last week's presidential debate. i think it was smart to get vice
FOX News
Oct 13, 2012 2:00am PDT
attack. they see barack obama and new york city the same day as netanyahu and on the same day, instead guess on a daily talk show. sometimes the words don't come out of your mouth the right way. was it a good idea to spend taxpayer dollars on cars in finland or wind mills in china? was it a good idea to borrow all of this money from countries like clina? here's the problem, they got caught turning medicare into a piggy bank for obamacare. >> sean: when i watched the debate a second time, charles, really paying attention and listening more deeply and not as distracted by biden, i realized, i thought paul ryan did a really good job. >> that's what i was trying to say last night, firead a transcript, i think you would conclude it was a draw. each side made their points. there was no way to refute all the other points. i thought the moderator was extremely intrusive. i would like when the moderator says, we have to move on, for one of the candidates to say, why the hell do we have to move on? we are in the middle of a very important discussion. we are going to continue. i don't like the wa
Search Results 0 to 9 of about 10 (some duplicates have been removed)